Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass (SASI Bypass): Short-Term Outcomes and Concerns.

BACKGROUND: Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) Bypass has recently emerged as a novel surgical technique. The purpose of this study is evaluating the efficacy and feasibility of our SASI technique. METHODS: Between April 2018 and February 2020, 83 patients underwent SASI bypass at our center. A retrospective analysis was performed. Forty-three patients (51.8%) completed follow-up at 12 months. RESULTS: Average BMI at 12 months, change in BMI, and %EWL were 28.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2, 13.5 ± 5.7 kg/m2, and 85.6% respectively. From the 25 patients evaluated, diabetes remission occurred in 95.8% of them. There were 4 (4.8%) Clavien-Dindo (CD) I, 5 (6.0%) CD II, and 2 (2.4%) CD IIIb complications. CONCLUSIONS: SASI bypass offers excellent weight loss and comorbidities resolution. As expected, higher-quality studies are needed.

Establishing consensus on the perioperative management of cholecystectomy in public hospitals: a Delphi study with an expert panel in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Several guidelines have put forward recommendations about the perioperative process of cholecystectomy. Despite the recommendations, controversy remains concerning several topics, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to develop uniform recommendations for perioperative practices in cholecystectomy in Mexico to standardize this process and save public health system resources. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used. An expert panel of 23 surgeons anonymously completed two rounds of responses to a 29-item questionnaire with 110 possible answers. The consensus was assessed using the percentage of responders agreeing on each question. RESULTS: From the 29 questions, the study generated 27 recommendations based on 20 (69.0%) questions reaching consensus, one that was considered uncertain (3.4%), and six (20.7%) items that remained open questions. In two (6.9%) cases, no consensus was reached, and no recommendation could be made. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides recommendations for the perioperative management of cholecystectomy in public hospitals in Mexico. As a guide for public institutions in low- and middle-income countries, the study identifies recommendations for perioperative tests and evaluations, perioperative decision making, postoperative interventions and institutional investment, that might ensure the safe practice of cholecystectomy and contribute to conserving resources.

La conductancia de la piel para evaluar el dolor y el estrés durante el cribado de la retinopatía de la prematuridad / Skin conductance to assess pain and stress during retinopathy of prematurity screening

No disponible

Gastro-ileal anastomosis bypass - Exploring for an expanding surgical treatment for diabetes in patients with low body mass index: Case series.

INTRODUCTION: Several metabolic operations have been created in an attempt to enhance the equilibrium between safety, efficacy and costs of accessible metabolic surgery in diabetic patients with low body mass index (BMI). The purpose of this study is to present the preliminary outcomes of a novel procedure. METHODS: A Gastro-Ileal Anastomosis Bypass (GIA-B) was performed in 4 diabetic patients at Boca del Rio Hospital, Veracruz, México. The study was performed between March 2018 and October 2019. GIA-B was created at point to 300 cm from ileocecal valve that was held together with gastric antrum. Outcomes are presented and discussed. At average 14.7 months follow-up all the patients improved glycated hemoglobin(A1C), decrease antidiabetic medications and lost mild weight. Two patients had complete remission of type-2 diabetes mellitus. There were no postoperative complications. RESULTS: GIA-B, have a considerable metabolic effect reaching improvement of the homeostatic parameters, specially A1C, in all the cases evaluated. GIA-B appears to be technically simple and the cost is considerably lower than other metabolic procedures, especially for the saving cartridges. CONCLUSIONS: GIA-B could be an alternative metabolic surgery for low-BMI diabetic patients, further studies are needed to explore this procedure.

Pain assessment during eye examination for retinopathy of prematurity screening: Skin conductance versus PIPP-R.

AIM: To assess changes in skin conductance during retinopathy of prematurity screening and to study the correlation between the skin conductance and a validated pain scale. METHODS: Prospective observational study. Fifty-three eye examinations were performed in 32 preterm infant candidates for retinopathy of prematurity screening. Outcome measures were changes in Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) scale and number of skin conductance fluctuations. RESULTS: There was a significant increase from baseline in the number of skin conductance fluctuations and PIPP-R during the procedure. The maximum value of number of skin conductance fluctuations was 0.64 ± 0.44 peaks/sec, and the maximum value of PIPP-R was 10.8 ± 3.3. A correlation between the skin conductance and PIPP-R was not found at any time during the eye examination. Repeated measures correlation analyses showed only a moderate positive correlation between PIPP-R and number of skin conductance fluctuation values. CONCLUSION: There were significant changes in both PIPP-R and number of skin conductance fluctuations during retinopathy of prematurity screening, reaffirming that this procedure is painful and stressful. The number of skin conductance fluctuations and PIPP-R are not significantly correlated, which likely reflects that these parameters evaluate different but complementary aspects of neonatal pain responses.

Fitobezoar posterior a mini bypass gástrico por laparoscopia / Phytobezoar after mini gastric bypass

Introducción. La miniderivación (mini-bypass) gástrica por laparoscopia es un procedimiento bariátrico que recientemente ha cobrado popularidad. Las alteraciones del tubo digestivo generadas por estos procedimientos pueden ocasionar diversas complicaciones, algunas raras, como los bezoares.Caso clínico. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 52 años de edad con antecedentes de diabetes mellitus y obesidad, que fue tratada con una miniderivación gástrica por laparoscopia. Nueve meses después del procedimiento, presentó dolor en el epigastrio, intolerancia a los alimentos y vómito, por lo cual se dio tratamiento sintomático sin obtener mejoría. Se practicó una endoscopia de vías digestivas altas, cuyo hallazgo fue un bezoar de coco que obstruía parcialmente la anastomosis. El bezoar se trituró y se extrajo por endoscopia. Discusión. Los pacientes con antecedentes de cirugía bariátrica tienen mayor riesgo de presentar bezoares por la modificación del tubo digestivo. Estos pacientes presentan frecuentemente síntomas de dispepsia, por lo que la sintomatología inespecífica puede confundirse o subestimarse. Se debe considerar practicar una endoscopia en todos aquellos con antecedentes de cirugía bariátrica que presenten vómito persistente después de ingerir alimentos o síntomas de obstrucción gástrica

Introduction: Laparoscopic Mini-gastric bypass is a bariatric procedure that has gained popularity recently. Alterations to the gastrointestinal tract anatomy created during these procedures, may lead to several complications, some of them very rare, such as the bezoar. Presentation of case: A fifty-two years old female with type II diabetes mellitus and obesity was treated by laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass surgery. Nine months after her surgery she experienced epigastric pain, intolerance to food and vomiting with non-successful symptomatic treatment. One month later, the patient underwent an upper GI endoscopy which reported a coconut bezoar partially obstructing the anastomosis. Bezoar was broken into pieces and removed endoscopically. Two days after, patient returned to normal diet. Conclusion: Patients with bariatric surgeries have a higher risk of presenting such masses because of the gas-trointestinal tract modifications. Symptoms can be confused or overlooked in bariatric patients since there is a frequent complain of dyspeptic symptoms after such procedures. An endoscopy should be considered in every patient who underwent a bariatric procedure and presents with persistent vomiting after food ingestion and/or gastric outlet symptoms

Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The open approach continues to be widely performed for ventral hernia repair, while the minimally invasive laparoscopic approach has grown adoption over the last decade. Recently, robotic operation was described as a new modality due to the ease for performing intracorporeal closure of the hernia defect. This study is one of the first multi-institutional case series evaluating robotic-assisted laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs, with the goal of describing robotic-assisted surgical techniques for ventral and incisional hernia repair and the outcomes in teaching and community hospital settings. METHODS: Medical records of consecutive patients (including surgeon's learning curve cases) who underwent ventral or incisional hernia repair utilizing the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale CA) were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included preoperative history and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Data for a total of 368 patients from four institutions involving five surgeons were analyzed. They were predominantly females (60.3 %), and the mean age was 51 years. The majority of the patients were obese or morbidly obese (47.8 and 20.9 %), and 83.2 % of the patients had a history of prior abdominal operation. Conversion rate was 0.8 %, and mean length of stay was 1 day. Total postoperative complications rate up to 30 days was 8.4 %, of which incidence of paralytic ileus was 2.4 %. CONCLUSION: This large case series of 368 patients demonstrates reproducibility of safety and performance associated with robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs performed by five surgeons at four institutions. In addition, the results of short term perioperative outcomes for surgeons during their early experience for robotic-assisted cases are in the range of what is reported in the existing published data on laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Further comparative evidence initiatives are being pursued to determine the benefits of robotic-assisted technique and technology for long-term and patient-reported outcomes.

A multicenter study of initial experience with single-incision robotic cholecystectomies (SIRC) demonstrating a high success rate in 465 cases.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the robotic single-site platform has been used to ameliorate the difficulties seen in single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILC) while preserving the benefits of standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical outcomes of a large series of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC). METHODS: Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent SIRC were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed by six surgeons at five different North American centers involved in the study. All patients included in the study underwent a cholecystectomy attempted through single site at the umbilicus, using the da Vinci(®) Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc. Sunnyvale, CA). RESULTS: A total of 465 patients met study criteria. Median age was 48 years (range 18-89); 351 (75.5 %) were female and 304 (66.4 %) were overweight or obese. Except for gender, case characteristics differed significantly by surgeon/site. Previous abdominal surgery was reported for 226 (48.6 %) cases. SIRC was successfully completed in 455 (97.8 %) cases, and there were no conversions to open surgery. Median surgical time was 52 min with a decreasing trend after 55-85 cases. Male gender, obesity and diagnoses other than biliary dyskinesia were independent predictors of longer surgical times. The complication rate was 2.6 %. CONCLUSIONS: Our large, multicenter study demonstrates that robotic single-site cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in a wide range of patients.

Gastropleural fistula after bariatric surgery: a report of two cases.

INTRODUCTION: Gastropleural fistulas (GPF) were first described by Markowitz and Herter in 1960. These are uncommon entities and can occur as a consequence of pulmonary surgery, trauma, malignancy, hiatal hernia, infections, Nissen fundoplication and most recently, bariatric surgery. Many treatments have been used for GPF, such as conservative management with antibiotics, parenteral nutrition, percutaneous drainage of collections and endoscopic therapies, but these usually fail and may lead to complex surgical procedures. CASE DESCRIPTION/OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: Two patients diagnosed with GPF after bariatric surgeries were treated in our program. After failure of conservative management, both were subjected to laparoscopic-robotic assisted gastropleural fistula resection. Case 1 was a patient who had a sleeve gastrectomy 1 year prior, required partial esophagogastrectomy and esophagojejunal anastomosis. Case 2 had an open gastric bypass 13 years prior, and when medical resolution of fistula was not possible, he underwent a partial remnant gastrectomy and hiatal hernia repair. DISCUSSION: Appearance of gastroplueral fistula after bariatric surgery is a rare occurrence. When surgical management is needed, we have noticed that the use of the robotic platform in these complex surgical cases is safe and feasible.

Intravenous acetaminophen in bariatric surgery: effects on opioid requirements.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are commonly used after bariatric surgery for pain control because of their potent analgesic effects. Nevertheless, the morbidly obese patient has increased risk for developing adverse effects produced by opioids (such as sedation, apnea, hypoxemia, ileus, and vomiting). Intravenous acetaminophen (IVA) has been evaluated in some specialties showing a reduction in opioid consumption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect on opioid consumption when IVA is administered in bariatric surgery patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent bariatric surgery. Group A included those patients who received IVA perioperatively and group B those who did not. The amount of opioids administered was calculated and compared for each group. RESULTS: Group A included 38 cases (44.7%) and group B included 47 cases (55.3%). A comparison was performed in terms of age (P = 0.349), body mass index (P = 0.311), gender (P = 0.890), American Society of Anesthesiologist score (P = 0.438), total surgical time (P = 0.497), perioperative complications (P = 0.786), number of procedures per surgeon (P = 0.08), and type of surgical procedure (P ≤ 0.01). Group A had a mean 24-h total opioid dose of 99.5 mg, whereas group B of 164.6 mg (P = 0.018). Group A received 39.5% less opioids than group B. A post hoc analysis determined a statistical power of 0.74. CONCLUSIONS: IVA used perioperatively can decrease opioid consumption in patients after bariatric surgery. Randomized trials are needed to corroborate these results.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary closure versus no primary closure of the defect: potential benefits of the robotic technology.

BACKGROUND: Some authors recommend primary closure of the defect before placement of the mesh. The purpose of this study is to compare laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) without primary closure of the defect (NPCD) versus LVHR with primary closure of the defect (PCD). METHODS: A retrospective review of 134 LVHR was performed. Each group included 67 cases. For the PCD group the robotic platform was used. RESULTS: Groups were similar in terms of demographics and comorbidities. For NPCD and PCD groups mean surgical time was 87.9±53.1 and 107.6±33.9 minutes (p = 0.012); conversion to open surgery was seen in 3(4.5%) and 1(1.5%) (p = 0.310); complications were 7(10.4%) and 2(3%) (p = 0.084); and finally, recurrences were seen in 5(7.5%) and 1(1.5%) (p = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS: PCD has longer surgical time, however, a tendency in terms of complications and recurrences was found favoring the PCD group. The robotic assistance is a good alternative when primary closure of the defect is attempted.

A comparative retrospective study of robotic sleeve gastrectomy vs robotic gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the robotic platform to bariatric surgery has brought forth a novel approach, with modifications to the standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB). The purpose of this study was to match robotic gastric bypass (RGB) vs robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) and compare them to those observed with the laparoscopic platform. METHODS: A retrospective data collection of RSGs and RGBs from a single institution was performed. Groups were compared. RESULTS: This study included 134 RSG and 165 RGB patients. RGB has a longer surgical time (p < 0.001) and a higher incidence of long-term complications (p = 0.005) but similar lengths of hospital stay (p = 0.093), rate of perioperative complications (p = 0.487) and EWL% at 1 year of follow-up compared to RSG. CONCLUSIONS: RSGs had shorter surgical times and a lower incidence of long-term complications when compared with RGBs. These results appear to be similar to those studies reporting the laparoscopic approach. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Impact of fellowship during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive surgery fellowship programs have been created in response to advancements in technology and patient's demands. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is a technique that has been shown to be safe and feasible, but this appears to be the case only for experienced surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of minimally invasive surgery fellow participation during SILC. METHODS: We reviewed data from our experience with SILC during 3 years. The cases were divided in two groups: group 1 comprised procedures performed by the main attending without the presence of the fellow, and group 2 comprised procedures performed with the fellow present during the operation. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, indication for surgery, total surgical time, hospital length of stay, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The cohort included 229 patients: 142 (62%) were included in group 1 and 87 (38%) in group 2. No differences were found in demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and indication for surgery between groups. The total surgical time was 34.4 ± 11.4 minutes for group 1 and 46.8 ± 16.0 minutes for group 2 (P < .001). The hospital length of stay was 0.89 0.32 days for group 1 and 1.01 ± 0.40 days for group 2 (P = .027). No intraoperative complications were seen in either group. There were 3 postoperative complications (2.1%) in group 1 and none in group 2 (P = .172). CONCLUSION: Adoption of SILC during an established fellowship program is safe and feasible. A longer surgical time is expected during the teaching process.

Rare use of robotic surgery for removal of large urachal carcinoma.

Minimally invasive surgery has been used traditionally for removal of colorectal, gastric and gallbladder disease pathologies with great success. Many advantages have been demonstrated with the addition of robotic surgery, such as 3-D visualization, articulation of instruments and improved surgeon ergonomics while operating. These benefits have allowed the implementation of robotic surgery into new areas. We describe here a rare case of a robotic resection of an urachal carcinoma. A 53-year-old female patient presented to her primary care physician (PCP) with a chief complaint of recurrent urinary tract infections. An initial urinary bladder ultrasound showed a large mass anterior and superior to the bladder, thus prompting an abdominal/pelvic MRI, which confirmed a large complex cystic mass anterior to and abutting the urinary bladder (5.4 × 6.7 × 5.9 cm). A follow-up cystoscopy showed no abnormal findings within the bladder. Based on the patient's symptoms and imaging, a careful evaluation by her PCP, oncology and surgical team prompted for the removal of the mass. Because of the uncertainty, complexity and location of the mass the patient was offered surgical treatment with the da Vinci robot. Histopathology revealed an urachal adenocarcinoma, well differentiated. We present that surgical resection of an urachal tumor can be performed with the da Vinci robot. Robotic surgery can add to the benefits seen with the conventional laparoscopic approach and thus can be an accepted method for treatment of abdominal wall masses.

Robotic sleeve gastrectomy: experience of 134 cases and comparison with a systematic review of the laparoscopic approach.

BACKGROUND: Robotic technology has recently emerged in different surgical specialties, but the experience with robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) is scarce in the literature. The purpose of this study is to compare our preliminary experience with RSG versus the descriptive results of a systematic review of the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: Data from our RSG experience were retrospectively collected. Two surgeons performed all the cases in one single surgery center. Such information was compared with a systematic review of 22 selected studies that included 3,148 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) cases. RSG were performed using the daVinci Surgical System. RESULTS: This study included 134 RSG vs. 3,148 LSG. Mean age and mean BMI was 43 ± 12.6 vs. 40.7 ± 11.6 (p = 0.022), and 45 ± 7.1 vs. 43.6 ± 8.1 (p = 0.043), respectively. Leaks were found in 0 RSG vs. 1.97% LSG (p = 0.101); strictures in 0 vs. 0.43% (p = 0.447); bleeding in 0.7 vs. 1.21% (p = 0.594); and mortality in 0 vs. 0.1% (p = 0.714), respectively. Mean surgical time was calculated in 106.6 ± 48.8 vs. 94.5 ± 39.9 min (p = 0.006); and mean hospital length of stay was 2.2 ± 0.6 vs. 3.3 ± 1.7 days (p = <0.005), respectively. Four (2.9%) complications were found in our robotic series. CONCLUSIONS: Our series shows that RSG is a safe alternative when used in bariatric surgery, showing similar results as the laparoscopic approach. Surgical time is longer in the robotic approach, while hospital length of stay is lower. No leaks or strictures were found in the robotic cases. However, further studies with larger sample size and randomization are warranted.

Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms.

BACKGROUND: Many series have shown the feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), but this technique still has limitations such as instrument collisions and lack of triangulation. Recently, two single-incision platforms, robotic and SPIDER, have attempted to ameliorate such problems. This study aimed to compare three different techniques of single-incision cholecystectomy: standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER approaches. METHODS: The authors retrospectively collected data from their first 166 single-incision robotic cholecystectomies (SIRCs) and compared the findings with the data from their first 166 SILCs and the first 166 s-generation SPIDER procedures. All the SILCs were performed with three trocars placed in one umbilical incision and with gallbladder retraction using a Prolene stitch on the right upper quadrant. All the robotic cases were managed using the da Vinci Single-Site Surgical System, and all the SPIDER procedures were performed using the SPIDER Surgical System. RESULTS: The SILC, SIRC, and SPIDER groups consisted respectively of 129 (76.3%), 131 (78.9%), and 136 (81.9%) women with the respective mean ages of 44.5 ± 14.3, 51.6 ± 15.9, and 46.4 ± 15.2 years. The mean body mass indexes (BMIs) were respectively 29.1 ± 5.6, 29.4 ± 6.2, and 27.5 ± 4.8 kg/m(2), and the mean surgical times were 37.1 ± 13.3, 63.0 ± 25.2, and 52.8 ± 18.7 min. The total hospital stays were respectively 1.3 ± 5.3, 1.2 ± 2.2, and 1.5 ± 2.6 days, and complications were seen respectively in three SILC cases (1.8%), three SIRC cases (1.8%), and two SPIDER cases (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate similar results among the three platforms for most of the parameters measured. The SILC procedure appears to be superior to SIRC and SPIDER in terms of surgical time, but selection bias could be the cause. The SILS, SIRC, and SPIDER procedures all are similar in terms of complication profile. It can be concluded that SILC, SIRC, and SPIDER all are feasible and safe alternatives when used for single-incision cholecystectomy.

Robotic repair of giant paraesophageal hernias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Giant paraesophageal hernia accounts for 5% of all hiatal hernias, and it is commonly seen in elderly patients with comorbidities. Some series report complication rates up to 28%, recurrence rates between 10% and 25%, and a mortality rate close to 2%. Recently, the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has shown equivocal benefits when used for elective surgeries, whereas for complex procedures, the benefits appear to be clearer. The purpose of this study is to present our preliminary experience in robotic giant paraesophageal hernia repair. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients who had a diagnosis of giant paraesophageal hernia and underwent a paraesophageal hernia repair with the da Vinci Surgical System. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (12 women [63.1%]) underwent surgery for giant paraesophageal hernia at our center. The mean age was 70.4 ± 13.9 years (range, 40-97 years). The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.15. The mean surgical time and hospital length of stay were 184.5 ± 96.2 minutes (range, 96-395 minutes) and 4.3 days (range, 2-22 days), respectively. Nissen fundoplications were performed in 3 cases (15.7%), and 16 patients (84.2%) had mesh placed. Six patients (31.5%) presented with gastric volvulus, and 2 patients had other herniated viscera (colon and duodenum). There were 2 surgery-related complications (10.5%) (1 dysphagia that required dilatation and 1 pleural injury) and 1 conversion to open repair (partial gastric resection). No recurrences or deaths were observed in this series. CONCLUSION: In our experience robotic giant paraesophageal hernia repair is not different from the laparoscopic approach in terms of complications and mortality rate, but it may be associated with lower recurrence rates. However, larger series with longer follow-up are necessary to further substantiate our results.